MBCI_Resistance

Is Green Sustainable?

Troy Brown Sunday, 02/28/2010 | Posted by Troy Brown

Blog Tags: Green, Sustainable, definitions

Articles and ads frequently use the terms “green” and “sustainable” interchangeably. Do they really mean the same thing?

Sustainable implies a higher threshold and meeting multiple environmental criteria, as well as economic and social factors. To be sustainable, something must necessarily be green. But, not all green things are sustainable.

For example, the garbage trucks in my town have various environmental messages displayed on their sides – how many tons of materials the company recycles each year, the amount of habitat it creates on finished landfills, etc. Those are green actions since they’re better for the environment than not doing them, but sustainability needs to take into account how much of something is being used or depleted and over what time period, and its ability to be profitably and beneficially continued indefinitely. In the case of garbage hauling and disposal, sustainability may mean generating less waste to begin with, rather than handling it more efficiently. (By the way, the garbage company doesn’t claim that its actions are sustainable, just green.)

What do you think about green versus sustainable? Is it important to draw a distinction?


  • Currently 2.4/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 from 32 votes
 


  • Sara Demetroff It seems any more that these terms are used as marketing slang in order to promote new products or services, but there really is a serious ideology trying to define itself through the use of these terms. Perhaps we could consider using terms like regenerative design and life cycle analysis more frequently in addition to "green" and "sustainable" in order to discuss the intentions of green builders more directly.
    03/02/2010

Tweet #GXPO365 | Pin It

Copyright © 2013 by i365Tech. All rights reserved.

|